Re: ftrace introduces instability into kernel 2.6.27(-rc2,-rc3)

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Aug 18 2008 - 23:32:20 EST



On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > Hmm, this was originally copied from x86, where we did a cmpxchg, but that
> > > > is probably not needed since all of this is done in kstop_machine. Also,
> > > > only the "get" is needed. If we don't fault there, we wont fault on the
> > > > put (unless we have permissions wrong, and that would be a bug).
> > >
> > > Would it ? How do we make sure the kernel text is mapped writeable ?
> >
> > We map it writeable if FTRACE is enabled.
> >
>
> Argh. See text_poke(). It's there exactly for this purpose on x86.

Ouch, I just did. text_poke is quite heavy. It would be interesting to see
that performed on 20,000 locations at one time. I could play with it, but
I'm a bit nervous.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/