[PATCH 2/2] posix-timers: check ->it_signal instead of ->it_pid to validate the timer

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Wed Aug 20 2008 - 12:10:24 EST


->it_pid (was ->it_process) has also a special meaning: if it is NULL,
the timer is under deletion or it wasn't initialized yet. We can check
->it_signal != NULL instead, this way we can

- simplify sys_timer_create() a bit

- remove yet another check from lock_timer()

- move put_pid(->it_pid) into release_posix_timer() which
runs outside of ->it_lock

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- 26-rc2/kernel/posix-timers.c~12_USE_SIGNAL_MORE 2008-08-17 18:34:09.000000000 +0400
+++ 26-rc2/kernel/posix-timers.c 2008-08-17 21:09:52.000000000 +0400
@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ static void release_posix_timer(struct k
idr_remove(&posix_timers_id, tmr->it_id);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idr_lock, flags);
}
+ put_pid(tmr->it_pid);
sigqueue_free(tmr->sigq);
kmem_cache_free(posix_timers_cache, tmr);
}
@@ -465,7 +466,6 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_c
int new_timer_id;
sigevent_t event;
int it_id_set = IT_ID_NOT_SET;
- struct pid *it_pid;

if (invalid_clockid(which_clock))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -517,9 +517,9 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_c
goto out;
}
rcu_read_lock();
- it_pid = get_pid(good_sigevent(&event));
+ new_timer->it_pid = get_pid(good_sigevent(&event));
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (!it_pid) {
+ if (!new_timer->it_pid) {
error = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_c
event.sigev_notify = SIGEV_SIGNAL;
event.sigev_signo = SIGALRM;
event.sigev_value.sival_int = new_timer->it_id;
- it_pid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
+ new_timer->it_pid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
}

new_timer->it_sigev_notify = event.sigev_notify;
@@ -537,7 +537,6 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_c
new_timer->sigq->info.si_code = SI_TIMER;

spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
- new_timer->it_pid = it_pid;
new_timer->it_signal = current->signal;
list_add(&new_timer->list, &current->signal->posix_timers);
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
@@ -573,7 +572,7 @@ static struct k_itimer *lock_timer(timer
timr = idr_find(&posix_timers_id, (int)timer_id);
if (timr) {
spin_lock(&timr->it_lock);
- if (timr->it_pid && timr->it_signal == current->signal) {
+ if (timr->it_signal == current->signal) {
spin_unlock(&idr_lock);
return timr;
}
@@ -822,8 +821,7 @@ retry_delete:
* This keeps any tasks waiting on the spin lock from thinking
* they got something (see the lock code above).
*/
- put_pid(timer->it_pid);
- timer->it_pid = NULL;
+ timer->it_signal = NULL;

unlock_timer(timer, flags);
release_posix_timer(timer, IT_ID_SET);
@@ -849,8 +847,7 @@ retry_delete:
* This keeps any tasks waiting on the spin lock from thinking
* they got something (see the lock code above).
*/
- put_pid(timer->it_pid);
- timer->it_pid = NULL;
+ timer->it_signal = NULL;

unlock_timer(timer, flags);
release_posix_timer(timer, IT_ID_SET);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/