Re: Fundamental Design Flaw of the Device Driver Model?

[Eric Miao]

> Instead of allocating/adding the platform subdevices manually in
> da903x_add_subdevs, couldn't you use the MFD (multi function device)
> infrastructure that seems to be intended for this case? Also, I think
> that the da9030 base driver would then better fit in drivers/mfd, not
> drivers/i2c/chips (didn't Jean Delvare himself state that ideally
> drivers/i2c/chips should be empty?).

Actually, I don't mind keep it anywhere. The intermediate
platform_device is what I'd like to avoid mostly. Using my
own simple logic allows me to do that later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/