Re: e1000 horridness (was Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected)

[Jeff Kirsher]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> e1000_check_options builds a struct (singular) on the stack, really... struct
>>> e1000_option is reasonably small.
>>
>> No it doesn't.
>>
>> Look a bit more closely.
>>
>> It builds a struct (singular) MANY MANY times. It also then builds up a
>> huge e1000_opt_list[] array, even though it is const and should be static
>> (and const).
>>
>> I know. I wrote a patch to FIX it.
>
> totally cool patch afaics - if I still maintained this driver I'd have this tested
> and merged right away :)
>
> I suppose Jeff Kirsher is already doing so right now

You suppose correctly.
.
>
> I suppose that he'll have to look at the other Intel ethernet drivers as well :)
>
> Jeff, please add my:
>
> Reveiewed-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@xxxxxxxxx>
>

Will do.

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/