Re: [PATCH] cgroup(fix critical bug): new handling for tasks file

[Lai Jiangshan]

Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> And vmalloc can malloc larger memory than kmalloc, is vmalloc() enough?
>> If not, I think using an array of pages is the best choice.
> 
> vmalloc would be simpler, certainly, but it has a higher overhead. And
> since we're dealing with arrays of integers here, it's not too hard to
> manage multiple arrays. Oh, except for sorting them, which would be
> more of a pain. So yes, maybe vmalloc() would be a better choice at
> first.
> 
Yep, these are hard. Which method is your favorite?

My original purpose was to fix a bug as I described. 
This bug and the problem that offering big enough array for a huge
cgroup are orthogonal!

Could you consider/test that is it a bug as I described(and is it as
critical as I described, maybe I was too nervous)?
And this is also a problem: opening a cgroup.tasks twice or will waste
a lot of _physical_ memory.

    Thanks! Lai

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/