Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] x86: use mwait for trigger API

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Samstag, 16. August 2008 schrieb Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
>
> Seems that this cant work. We never reset the t->cpus bits. That means we 
> never mwait after a kick.
>   

Yeah, I have to admit I never tested this code (it was an RFC, after
all).  And after Arjan said that mwait is unusable, I didn't spend any
more effort on it.

> See:
>
>   
>> +void mwait_trigger_reset(trigger_t *t)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	t->trigger = 0;
>> +
>> +	local_save_flags(flags);
>> +	__get_cpu_var(mwait_saved_flags) = flags;
>> +
>> +	__monitor(&t->trigger, 0, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void mwait_trigger_wait(trigger_t *t)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long flags = __get_cpu_var(mwait_saved_flags);
>> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> +
>> +	if (irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
>> +		while(!cpu_isset(cpu, t->cpus)) {
>>     
>
> We check the bits here
>
>   
>> +			__mwait(0, 0);
>> +			barrier();
>> +			__monitor(&t->trigger, 0, 0);
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		while(!cpu_isset(cpu, t->cpus)) {
>>     
>
> and here
>
>   
>> +			__sti_mwait(0, 0);
>> +			barrier();
>> +			local_irq_disable();
>> +			__monitor(&t->trigger, 0, 0);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>     

Must have lost a line somewhere.  It's supposed to clear the bit here,
before wait returns.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/