Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Alexey,

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Would it help (to make this less
> > horrible) to omit the type declaration and have just the bitfield
> > members as arguments to the macro?
>
> Or you can parse instruction stream a bit more.

Uhm, I'm not sure how that would work out. I mean, we'd need to see if 
parts of the loaded byte are used or not... Doesn't sound practical or 
too pretty.

		Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/