On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:48 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:--Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:If Oren's purpose is not quite to create a upstreamable patchset,(Or, is that too much effort required on your part to try andThat would probably work as long as Oren is working on top of what I
cherrypick bits of Oren's changes back into your tree?)
have. It's going to be a lot harder if I have to repeat the same
break-out process for each iteration of Oren's patches, though.
then it would make more sense for him to keep a git tree and
put new patches on top of his existing ones (within reaason as he
rebases). Then you'd at least be able to trivially look at the latest
deltas.
The trick would be compromising on things that I, for instance, think
need to be rewritten or removed.
Oren would have to rebase his work against what I do. I guess you could
think about it like me being upstream from Oren. Anything that I would
change, Oren would need to rebase on top of.
Oren, are you willing to keep a set of patches that add functionality on
top of a minimal set that I'm keeping? Mine being the set that we're
trying to push into mainline as soon as possible.
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers