Re: [PATCH 01/18] lirc core device driver infrastructure

[Christoph Bartelmus]

Hi,

on 09 Sep 08 at 13:03, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008 03:40:18 Sebastian Siewior wrote:
[...]
>>>+EXTRA_CFLAGS =-DIRCTL_DEV_MAJOR=61 -DLIRC_SERIAL_TRANSMITTER -I$(src)
>>
>> Do you rely on this specific major? Since your daemon opens /dev/lirc0
>> you don't need a fixed major do you?

> Good question. Quite honestly, I'm not sure. Christoph?

LIRC does not rely on a specific major. But to be honest, the last time I  
looked into this issue, was when devfs was bleeding-edge...

So, we need some advice here how to proceed. Should we try to register an  
official major number for LIRC? Should we try to have a minor number  
mapping, e.g.
/dev/lirc/serial/0 LIRC device on 1st UART serial port
...
/dev/lirc/serial/n LIRC device on n-th UART serial port
/dev/lirc/parallel/0 LIRC device on 1st parallel port
...
/dev/lirc/parallel/n LIRC device on n-th parallel port
/dev/lirc/usb/0 1st LIRC USB device
...

Christoph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/