Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rcX caused by commit bc19d6e0b74ef03a3baf035412c95192b54dfc6f

[Larry Finger]

Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 16:18:34 Larry Finger wrote:
>> Since commit bc19d6e0b74ef03a3baf035412c95192b54dfc6f entitled
>> "b43/b43legacy: add RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED support", the radio LED
>> no longer responds to rfkill switch events.
>>
>> ATM, I do not have a fix, other than reversion of this commit.
> 
> It's kind of bogus that it pokes with the software rfkill state
> from within the hardware rfkill handler.
> 
> Please revert this patch. The commit log says nothing about
> why this is needed and I don't see a point in overriding the state
> in the rfkill-private data structure from within the driver.

I agree with Michael. From what I know, the only possible reason for
having this state would be if user space could somehow affect the
state of the hardware switch. As the user's finger is the only such
thing, then there is no use for the RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED state,
particularly when it breaks LED operations.

Please revert the patch.

Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/