Re: [PATCH 03/23] AMD IOMMU: implement lazy IO/TLB flushing

From: FUJITA Tomonori
Date: Thu Sep 18 2008 - 19:11:10 EST


On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:03:50 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:29:24AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:28:27 +0200
> > Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:20:18AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:52:37 +0200
> > > > Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The IO/TLB flushing on every unmaping operation is the most expensive
> > > > > part there and not strictly necessary. It is sufficient to do the flush
> > > > > before any entries are reused. This is patch implements lazy IO/TLB
> > > > > flushing which does exactly this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++++
> > > > > arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > > arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu_init.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > > > include/asm-x86/amd_iommu_types.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > > > 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > index c2e00ee..5f0aefe 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > @@ -284,6 +284,11 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
> > > > > isolate - enable device isolation (each device, as far
> > > > > as possible, will get its own protection
> > > > > domain)
> > > > > + unmap_flush - enable flushing of IO/TLB entries when
> > > > > + they are unmapped. Otherwise they are
> > > > > + flushed before they will be reused, which
> > > > > + is a lot of faster
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > Would it be nice to have consistency of IOMMU parameters?
> > >
> > > True. We should merge common parameters across IOMMUs into the
> > > iommu= parameter some time in the future, I think. It would also be the
> > > place for the IOMMU size parameter.
> >
> > Hmm, now is better than the future? I think that now you can add
> > something like 'disable_batching_flush' as a common parameter and
> > change AMD IOMMU to use it.
>
> Ok, I queued the following patch in the AMD IOMMU updates and changed
> this patch to use iommu_fullflush instead. Is this patch ok? It changes
> the behavior of GART to use lazy flushing by default. But I don't think
> that this is a problem.
>
> commit 9769771290fddcfc0362c5d30242151d4eb1cc46
> Author: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu Sep 18 15:23:43 2008 +0200
>
> x86: move GART TLB flushing options to generic code
>
> The GART currently implements the iommu=[no]fullflush command line
> parameters which influence its IO/TLB flushing strategy. This patch
> makes these parameters generic so that they can be used by the AMD IOMMU
> too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index c2e00ee..569527e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -888,6 +888,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
> nomerge
> forcesac
> soft
> + fullflush
> + Flush IO/TLB at every deallocation
> + nofullflush
> + Flush IO/TLB only when addresses are reused (default)

I'm not sure about making 'nofullflush' a generic option. Enabling
nofullflush option doesn't change anything. So what's the point of the
option?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/