Re: [PATCH -tip] uaccess: fix parameters inversion for__copy_from_user_inatomic()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:04:26 -0700
> Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The following patch changes to use __copy_from_user_inatomic(),
> > but the passing parameters incorrect.
> > 
> >     x86: some lock annotations for user copy paths, v3
> > 
> >     - add annotation back to clear_user()
> >     - change probe_kernel_address() to _inatomic*() method
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/uaccess.h |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> > index 2062293..6b58367 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __copy_from_user_nocache(void *to,
> >  							\
> >  		set_fs(KERNEL_DS);			\
> >  		pagefault_disable();			\
> > -		ret = __copy_from_user_inatomic((__force typeof(retval) __user *)(addr), &(retval), sizeof(retval));		\
> > +		ret = __copy_from_user_inatomic(&(retval), (__force typeof(retval) __user *)(addr), sizeof(retval));		\
> >  		pagefault_enable();			\
> >  		set_fs(old_fs);				\
> >  		ret;					\
> 
> The bug which this fixes was merged into linux-next-20080918, and
> manifests as squillions of messages like
> 
> [   58.693759] SLAB: cache with size 65536 has lost its name
> [   58.693926] SLAB: cache with size 65536 has lost its name
> [   58.694095] SLAB: cache with size 32768 has lost its name
> [   58.694261] SLAB: cache with size 32768 has lost its name
> [   58.694434] SLAB: cache with size 16384 has lost its name
> [   58.694606] SLAB: cache with size 16384 has lost its name
> [   58.694773] SLAB: cache with size 8192 has lost its name
> [   58.694940] SLAB: cache with size 8192 has lost its name
> [   58.695101] SLAB: cache with size 4096 has lost its name
> 
> so this version of linux-next (which will be the most-recent
> version of linux-next for the next three weeks) will need this patch:

that's already fixed via the commit below 4 days ago - i should have 
pushed it into tip/auto-core-next - did that now.

	Ingo

------------------->