[PATCH 2/6] sched: fixlet for group load balance

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Sep 23 2008 - 09:37:58 EST


We should not only correct the increment for the initial group, but should
be consistent and do so for all the groups we encounter.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1086,7 +1086,6 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_g
long wl, long wg)
{
struct sched_entity *se = tg->se[cpu];
- long more_w;

if (!tg->parent)
return wl;
@@ -1098,18 +1097,17 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_g
if (!wl && sched_feat(ASYM_EFF_LOAD))
return wl;

- /*
- * Instead of using this increment, also add the difference
- * between when the shares were last updated and now.
- */
- more_w = se->my_q->load.weight - se->my_q->rq_weight;
- wl += more_w;
- wg += more_w;
-
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
-#define D(n) (likely(n) ? (n) : 1)
-
long S, rw, s, a, b;
+ long more_w;
+
+ /*
+ * Instead of using this increment, also add the difference
+ * between when the shares were last updated and now.
+ */
+ more_w = se->my_q->load.weight - se->my_q->rq_weight;
+ wl += more_w;
+ wg += more_w;

S = se->my_q->tg->shares;
s = se->my_q->shares;
@@ -1118,7 +1116,11 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_g
a = S*(rw + wl);
b = S*rw + s*wg;

- wl = s*(a-b)/D(b);
+ wl = s*(a-b);
+
+ if (likely(b))
+ wl /= b;
+
/*
* Assume the group is already running and will
* thus already be accounted for in the weight.
@@ -1127,7 +1129,6 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_g
* alter the group weight.
*/
wg = 0;
-#undef D
}

return wl;

--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/