Re: [RFC][PATCH] Demultiplexing SIGTRAP signal -v2

[Gabriel Paubert]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:55:01PM +0530, Srinivasa Ds wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 17:00:01 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > applied to [the new topic] tip/core/signal, thanks Srinivasa! There
> > > are some other pending x86 signal changes already, so i based
> > > tip/core/signal on tip/x86/signal.
> >
> > -tip testing found the following build error with the attached config:
> >
> 
> Ingo, Reproduced build break issue with your config on tip tree. It was a costly overlook 
> to miss one header file. I included it in this patch and tested it out.
> 
> 
> Currently a SIGTRAP can denote any one of below reasons.
> 	- Breakpoint hit
> 	- H/W debug register hit
> 	- Single step
> 	- Signal sent through kill() or rasie()

Typo: s/rasie/raise/

No strong opinion about the patch, but more info is usually better.

	Regards,
	Gabriel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/