Re: v2.6.27-rc7: x86: #GP on panic?

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > With 2.6.27-rc7 on qemu-x86_64, it seems that panic will trigger a 
> > General Protection Fault. I haven't seen it before.
>
> > [    4.523641] Code: eb fd 55 48 89 e5 53 51 83 3d 25 e8 78 00 00 75
> > 1a 31 d2 31 f6 48 c7 c7 e1 9c 01 81 e8 f7 a4 03 00 9c 5b fa e8 94 09
> > 00 00 53 9d <5a> 5b c9 c3 55 31 c0 48 89 e5 89 04 25 b0 c0 5f ff 65 83
> > 04 25
>
> hm, 0x5a is a simple pop %rdx. A #GP there means the stack segment is 
> bust?

No, that would be #SS (and segments don't really exist in 64-bit mode 
anyway.)  In 32-bit mode it could mean a code segment overrun.

*However*...

[    4.523477] general protection fault: fff2 [1] SMP

There is an error code attached to the #GP, which is supposed to mean 
that somehow a segment selector was involved. This doesn't look like a 
very valid segment selector at all.

> hm:
>
> > ffffffff8101a6b9 <disable_local_APIC>
> > ffffffff81019d25:       53                      push   %rbx
> > ffffffff81019d26:       9d                      popfq
> > ffffffff81019d27:       5a                      pop    %rdx
>
> so it's preceded by a popfq and on the next instruction we #GP.
>
> but the stack and flags state looks good:
>
>   [    4.523641] RSP: 0018:ffff880007867d70  EFLAGS: 00000286

My guess is that the popfq enables interrupts, and we try to take an 
interrupt through an IDT entry which isn't set up correctly.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/