Re: SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match

[Tilman Baumann]

Am 25.09.2008 um 21:57 schrieb Paul Moore:
> > What i do with this match is just setting some CONNMARK and
> > respectively FWMARKS to make crazy routing rules for different kinds
> > (marked processes)
> > of my outgoing traffic based on them.
>
> I think I understand you goal now, essentially you want to route  
> traffic
> based on the security label of the sender, yes?  There was some brief
> talk about this at the SELinux Developer's Summit this year at OLS.
> Unfortunately, it was just a casual conversation and I haven't seen  
> any
> patches since then implementing security label based routing.

Wow, now it strikes me that i was running around blind all the time.
SECMARK is a target not a match.
I always thought i would implementing much the same thing.

I guess there would be in fact currently not way to set a MARK or  
CONNMAK
based on a SECMARK. Most of the *MARK targets have a --restore-mark  
option
to restore a mark into the packet mark.
But since the SECMARK is not numeric/bitmask there is nothing to  
restore.
They however can do the same in regard do CONNSECMARK and SECMARK
but which would not help in this case.
A secmark netfilter _match_ could do the trick here.

Well here is how i did this, maybe something like this is the way to  
go for
SELinux (or LSM in general) too.

I'm surprised that i have not realized this little detail before. :-/

Regards
 Tilman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/