Re: [PATCH 12/13] hrtimer: create a "timer_slack" field in the taskstruct

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:16:09 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I wonder to why PR_SET_TIMERSLACK decreasing doesn't need root
> privilege.
> 
> example,
> nice() systemcall is
>   - nice increasing (pirority decreasing) doesn't need root privilege.
>   - nice decreasing (priority incriasing) need root privilege.
> 
> So, I think time slack setting need similar one.
> Otherwise, non-privilege user can increase power consumpsion easily
> by PR_SET_TIMERSLACK.
> 
> What do you think?

setting timerslack to 0 has no real negative effects on the system on
the one hand, on the other hand, it'll be multimedia apps and games who
want to do this.

Requiring this type of app to be root doesn't sound like a good idea,
especially since all you get by "cheating" is ... the exact behavior
you ask for anyway. "Increased power consumption" isn't a root
privilege, the app can consume much more power just by a "while (1);"
loop for example.



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/