Re: unpredictability in scheduler test results -- still present

[Ingo Molnar]

* Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> It turns out that disabling CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE makes the load  
>>> balancing problem go away and causes all cpus to be used.
>>>
>>> With this option enabled, the problem seems to be present as far back 
>>> as 2.6.27-rc2.  (2.6.27-rc1 doesn't compile on my machine, and 2.6.26 
>>> doesn't have ftrace).
>>>
>>> I have no idea why turning on dynamic ftrace would affect load  
>>> balancing behaviour, but it's very repeatable.  The very first test  
>>> run after booting works fine, and all successive runs fail to balance 
>>> properly.
>
>> OTOH, what does 'truning on dftrace' exactly mean? Just enabling it in  
>> the .config, or also activating it via /debug/tracing/current_tracer?
>
> Just enabling it in the .config is enough to trigger the behaviour 
> change.  I'm not explicitly activating any traces.

ok, that would be a clear ftrace bug i guess?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/