Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM

[Jesse Brandeburg]

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The confirmed bugs where the nvram acquire code was called
> concurrently are still in your tree and the prevention patch along
> with the resulting bugfixes are stuck in some obscure intel QA
> process.
>
> Please apply at least the bug prevention patch below.

This is the same patch I posted 7 minutes ago, except that this patch
without the e1000e changes applied before it will cause all sorts of
WARN's to be printed during normal operation.  If at all possible I
think they should stay together as a group to prevent un-necessary
noise in the logs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/