Re: [PATCH] x86 Topology cpu_to_node parameter check

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri Oct 03 2008 - 01:21:07 EST



On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> ---
> include/asm-x86/topology.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/topology.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/asm-x86/topology.h 2008-10-03 00:37:05.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/topology.h 2008-10-03 00:45:52.000000000 -0400
> @@ -182,9 +182,9 @@ extern int __node_distance(int, int);
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
>
> -#define numa_node_id() 0
> -#define cpu_to_node(cpu) 0
> -#define early_cpu_to_node(cpu) 0
> +#define numa_node_id() 0
> +#define cpu_to_node(cpu) ((void)(cpu),0)
> +#define early_cpu_to_node(cpu) cpu_to_node(cpu)

Actually the proper way would be to have:

static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
{
return 0;
}

static inline int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
{
return 0;
}

This way you also get typechecks.

-- Steve

>
> static inline const cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node)
> {
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/