On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:06:23PM -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
[...]
+ if (dom->flavour != &svcauth_unix
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+ && dom->flavour != &svcauth_seclabel
+#endif
+ )
if (dom->flavour != &svcauth_unix)
return -EINVAL;
udom = container_of(dom, struct unix_domain, h);
@@ -873,3 +889,80 @@ struct auth_ops svcauth_unix = {
.set_client = svcauth_unix_set_client,
};
checkpatch picked up on a suspect code indent for this hunk. It is
unhappy about the second if expecting it to be indented. By the looks
of this I am suspecting a miss-merge of the change in this function and
the second if should have been removed. To my reading it actually still
does the right thing but ...