Re: Please pull - generic HDLC

[Krzysztof Halasa]

Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The over 3 weeks old -next already contains mostly the same as the HDLC 
> tree contains now.
>
> The thing you two should sort out is why the tree ended up as an own 
> tree in -next instead of pull requests to David long ago.
>
> E.g. the netdev and wireless trees also don't go into -next, but instead 
> with frequent pull requests to David.

I can't see any problem with this, is there any?

I want the HDLC tree tested in next before it's merged upstream
(= David's tree(s)). I don't want to push crap upstream  first and
only then try to fix it (though a bug still slips in sometimes).
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/