Re: [RFC patch 04/15] get_cycles() : powerpc64 HAVE_GET_CYCLES

[Paul Mackerras]

Mathieu Desnoyers writes:

> This patch selects HAVE_GET_CYCLES and makes sure get_cycles_barrier() and
> get_cycles_rate() are implemented.

[snip]

> +static inline cycles_t get_cycles_rate(void)
> +{
> +	return CLOCK_TICK_RATE;
> +}

CLOCK_TICK_RATE is certainly wrong.  You want ppc_tb_freq (declared in
asm/time.h).  Or tb_ticks_per_sec, since we seem to have two variables
for exactly the same thing, for some reason. :)

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/