Re: [PATCH 2.6.27] x86: memtest fix use of reserve_early()

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Oct 22 2008 - 11:08:26 EST



* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Daniele Calore <orkaan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Wrong usage of 2nd parameter in reserve_early call.
> > 66/75: reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > The correct way is to use 'end' address and not 'size'.
> > As a bonus a fix to the printk format.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniele Calore <orkaan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
> > index 672e17f..9cab18b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
> > @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size,
> > last_bad += incr;
> > } else {
> > if (start_bad) {
> > - printk(KERN_CONT "\n %010lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
> > + printk(KERN_CONT "\n %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
> > val, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
> > - reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
> > + reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM");
> > }
> > start_bad = last_bad = start_phys_aligned;
> > }
> > @@ -72,9 +72,8 @@ static void __init memtest(unsigned long start_phys, unsigned long size,
> > if (start_bad) {
> > printk(KERN_CONT "\n %016lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved",
> > val, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
> > - reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM");
> > + reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad + incr, "BAD RAM");
> > }
> > -
> > }
> >
> > /* default is disabled */
>
> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>

applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks!

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/