Re: [PATCH 22/35] cpumask: deprecate any_online_cpu() in favour ofcpumask_any/cpumask_any_and From: Rusty Russell<rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> any_online_cpu() is a good name, but it takes a cpumask_t, not a
> pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>

almost all the patches have a missing \n and thus wrong authorship...

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/