[PATCH 1/9] checkpatch: add checks for in_atomic()

From: Andy Whitcroft
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 07:10:03 EST


in_atomic() is not for driver use so report any such use as an ERROR.
Also in_atomic() is often used to determine if we may sleep, but it is
not reliable in this use model therefore strongly discourage its use.

Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 +++++++++
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index e30bac1..dbbf96f 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2466,6 +2466,15 @@ sub process {
last;
}
}
+
+# whine mightly about in_atomic
+ if ($line =~ /\bin_atomic\s*\(/) {
+ if ($realfile =~ m@^drivers/@) {
+ ERROR("do not use in_atomic in drivers\n" . $herecurr);
+ } else {
+ WARN("use of in_atomic() is incorrect outside core kernel code\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
+ }
}

# If we have no input at all, then there is nothing to report on
--
1.6.0.2.711.gf1ba4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/