Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with structcpumask

From: Mike Travis
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 12:17:25 EST


Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
>>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
>> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
>> arch changes for this reason.
>>
>>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
>>>
>>> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
>> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
>> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
>
> guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
> and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
> pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
> the rest of the changes.
>
> Ingo

Ok, no problem. I was integrating in the changes you already made so they
would not be dropped. But I'll send "update" patches instead of "replacement"
patches if you prefer.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/