Re: [PATCH 0/8] scheduler patches

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Oct 24 2008 - 06:29:20 EST


On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > 6-8 29 work
>
> Could we have a #9 that uses a no-fastpath-overhead min() method instead
> of avg_vruntime? Maybe we can get away without that overhead?

Looking at that suggestion, maybe I'll redo 7/8 so at to not depend on
6/8 using min from the get-go and fixing that XXX as well.

Will have to poke at it a little.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/