Re: [PULL] module, param and stop_machine patches

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Sun Oct 26 2008 - 04:16:43 EST


On Sunday 26 October 2008 09:33:43 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Thanks, Heiko tracked this down; he's probably sleeping now but Hugh and
> > Walt reported this fixes it for them and it makes sense.
>
> I'm not seeing any "tracked it down".

He tracked it down to moving init_workqueues() too early, so he moved that
back.

> And it then mixes things up with 'stop_machine_init()' mess. Why does that
> need to run so early?

The S/390 guys want to run it stop_machine v. early, so when Heiko introduced
stop_machine_init() he made it an early_initcall().

> IOW, I don't think that patch is anything but a "hey, test if it works
> with this". None of the changes or the problems are explained.

Indeed.

Turns out it's the cpu_online_map difference. If init_workqueues() is called
too early, only the boot cpu is set. We then only create_workqueue_thread()
for the boot cpu.

If CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y, it's fine since the hotplug callback will create the
workqueue threads for the other cpus as they come up. Without it, the kevent
workqueues on non-boot cpus don't get processed.

Still boots for me, but was a bit sick (varying, but no keyboard was one
symptom).

> Nor do I see a sign-off from Heiko on it.

I thought mine would be sufficient since we both work for IBM?

> I also don't want to see more BUG_ON()'s there. Make them warnings or
> something.

OK, I just killed them. It'll crash anyway.

Rusty.

Subject: Fix boot problems caused by moving init_workqueues()
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:16:22 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>

The patch below moves the init_workqueues() call to its old place but
makes the stop_machine initialization happen later (but still before
core_initcalls).

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/stop_machine.h | 6 ++++++
init/main.c | 5 +++--
kernel/stop_machine.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -r 2b5f764088ee include/linux/stop_machine.h
--- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h Sun Oct 26 18:50:23 2008 +1100
+++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h Sun Oct 26 19:13:04 2008 +1100
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ int stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void
* won't come or go while it's being called. Used by hotplug cpu.
*/
int __stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void *data, const cpumask_t *cpus);
+
+void stop_machine_init(void);
+
#else

static inline int stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void *data,
@@ -46,5 +49,8 @@ static inline int stop_machine(int (*fn)
local_irq_enable();
return ret;
}
+
+static inline void stop_machine_init(void) { }
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#endif /* _LINUX_STOP_MACHINE */
diff -r 2b5f764088ee init/main.c
--- a/init/main.c Sun Oct 26 18:50:23 2008 +1100
+++ b/init/main.c Sun Oct 26 19:13:04 2008 +1100
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/writeback.h>
+#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <linux/cgroup.h>
@@ -767,6 +768,8 @@ static void __init do_basic_setup(void)
static void __init do_basic_setup(void)
{
rcu_init_sched(); /* needed by module_init stage. */
+ init_workqueues();
+ stop_machine_init();
usermodehelper_init();
driver_init();
init_irq_proc();
@@ -850,8 +853,6 @@ static int __init kernel_init(void * unu

cad_pid = task_pid(current);

- init_workqueues();
-
smp_prepare_cpus(setup_max_cpus);

do_pre_smp_initcalls();
diff -r 2b5f764088ee kernel/stop_machine.c
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c Sun Oct 26 18:50:23 2008 +1100
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c Sun Oct 26 19:13:04 2008 +1100
@@ -154,10 +154,8 @@ int stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stop_machine);

-static int __init stop_machine_init(void)
+void __init stop_machine_init(void)
{
stop_machine_wq = create_rt_workqueue("kstop");
stop_machine_work = alloc_percpu(struct work_struct);
- return 0;
}
-early_initcall(stop_machine_init);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/