Re: [PATCH] Rename DECLARE_MUTEX to DEFINE_SEMAPHORE

[Leon Woestenberg]

Hello,

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 13:06 +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
>> DECLARE_MUTEX is doubly misleading name (it actually _defines_ struct
>> _semaphore_ initialized to 1) and it can be confused with DEFINE_MUTEX
>> (which defines real struct mutex). Rename it.
>
> I'd prefer DEFINE_BINARY_SEM or somesuch
>
But it is not a binary semaphore, or is it?

Also, at least under 2.6.24,

#define DECLARE_MUTEX(name) __DECLARE_SEMAPHORE_GENERIC(name,1)

thus the DECLARE is wrong there as well?

Regards,
-- 
Leon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/