Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY withBIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Oct 29 2008 - 07:30:37 EST



* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > >> does it have any dependency on:
> > > >>
> > > >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] bio: define __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE
> > > >
> > > > No, they're independent. Defining __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE will be
> > > > useful for the Xen changes I need to make in the wake of Tomo's
> > > > patch.
> > >
> > > ok - applied to tip/x86/xen, thanks Jeremy! (also added Jens's
> > > Acked-by)
> >
> > build failure, zapped it:
> >
> > fs/bio.c: In function '__bio_add_page':
> > fs/bio.c:443: error: implicit declaration of function '__BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE'
>
> What patch(es) did you apply?

the one i replied to (2/2), and which one Jeremy said was independent
of 1/2. Not so much it appears.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/