Re: [PATCH][v3] blktrace: conversion to tracepoints

[Jens Axboe]

On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:18:55PM +0100, Jens Axboe escreveu:
> > > 	Feel free to point any disgusting aspect, perhaps there is at
> > > least one to warn me about fixing 8-)
> > 
> > You my as well pass the members separately now that it's a specific call
> > anyway, to avoid doing the calculation when tracing is disabled.
> > 
> > Patch looks straight forward. Perhaps it would be cleaner to use an
> > atomic type for the reference?
> 
> Done and made the old pdu_int + NULL bio (trace_block_unplug_{io,timer})
> functions to receive just the request_queue.
> 
> Found and fixed a bug in the process:
> 
> In v2 we had:
> 
> +       unregister_trace_block_rq_insert(blk_add_trace_rq_insert);
> +       unregister_trace_block_rq_insert(blk_add_trace_rq_abort);
> 
> Where it should have been:
> 
> +       unregister_trace_block_rq_insert(blk_add_trace_rq_insert);
> +       unregister_trace_block_rq_abort(blk_add_trace_rq_abort);
> 
> c'n'p roblem!
> 
> Also removed the leftover tracepoint_synchronize_unregister macro, it
> was already merged righfully as an inline function.
> 
> Everything should be rock solid now 8)

I'll apply this for 2.6.29. I'm assuming you have tested this as well?

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/