Re: [PATCH] x86: simplify X86_MPPARSE config option

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> 30.10.08 11:51 >>>
>
>* Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/Kconfig |   12 ++----------
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> 
>> --- linux-2.6.28-rc2/arch/x86/Kconfig	2008-10-30 11:03:18.000000000 +0100
>> +++ 2.6.28-rc2-x86-kconfig-cleanup/arch/x86/Kconfig	2008-10-21 13:57:07.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -235,21 +235,13 @@ config X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG
>>  	def_bool y
>>  	depends on X86_MPPARSE || X86_VOYAGER
>>  
>> -if ACPI
>>  config X86_MPPARSE
>> -	def_bool y
>> -	bool "Enable MPS table"
>> +	bool "Enable MPS table" if ACPI
>> +	default y
>>  	depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC
>>  	help
>>  	  For old smp systems that do not have proper acpi support. Newer systems
>>  	  (esp with 64bit cpus) with acpi support, MADT and DSDT will override it
>> -endif
>> -
>> -if !ACPI
>> -config X86_MPPARSE
>> -	def_bool y
>> -	depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC
>> -endif
>
>hm, that's not an equivalent change. But i guess we can do this, it 
>sure looks like a cleaner construct.

Why is it not equivalent (apart from the help portion, which doesn't
matter when the prompt isn't visible)?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/