Re: next-20081030: voyager compile busted

[H. Peter Anvin]

James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> Before you advocate this, think what it would entail.  Voyager replaces
> (and has to replace because its not apic based) the entirety of smp.c
> and smpboot.c ... they'd all have to be abstracted through function
> pointers.
> 

... or through patched direct calls, which is of course also a possibility.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/