Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracepoint: introduce *_noupdate APIs.

[Lai Jiangshan]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> (Note, i had to resolve conflicts, hopefully i got the end result 
>> right. Please double-check tip/master.)
> 
> hm, it didnt work out. Below are the merged up commits against 
> tip/master, but they cause this build failure:
> 
>  kernel/tracepoint.c: In function âtracepoint_probe_unregisterâ:
>  kernel/tracepoint.c:380: error: label âendâ used but not defined
> 
> could you please resend against tip/master:
> 
>   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> -------------->
> commit 57bc8ea87d534303374932191273bdd3f3c37d09
> Author: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Oct 28 10:51:53 2008 +0800
> 
>     tracepoint: introduce *_noupdate APIs.
>     
>     Impact: add new tracepoint APIs to allow the batched registration of probes
>     
>     new APIs separate tracepoint_probe_register(),
>     tracepoint_probe_unregister() into 2 steps. The first step of them
>     is just update tracepoint_entry, not connect or disconnect.
>     
>     this patch introduces tracepoint_probe_update_all() for update all.
>     
>     these APIs are very useful for registering lots of probes
>     but just updating once. Another very important thing is that
>     *_noupdate APIs do not require module_mutex.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index c5bb39c..63064e9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ extern int tracepoint_probe_register(const char *name, void *probe);
>   */
>  extern int tracepoint_probe_unregister(const char *name, void *probe);
>  
> +extern int tracepoint_probe_register_noupdate(const char *name, void *probe);
> +extern int tracepoint_probe_unregister_noupdate(const char *name, void *probe);
> +extern void tracepoint_probe_update_all(void);
> +
>  struct tracepoint_iter {
>  	struct module *module;
>  	struct tracepoint *tracepoint;
> diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> index 4159c2a..c39bdbc 100644
> --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,10 @@ struct tracepoint_entry {
>  };
>  
>  struct tp_probes {
> -	struct rcu_head rcu;
> +	union {
> +		struct rcu_head rcu;
> +		struct list_head list;
> +	} u;
>  	void *probes[0];
>  };
>  
> @@ -72,7 +75,7 @@ static inline void *allocate_probes(int count)
>  
>  static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head)
>  {
> -	kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu));
> +	kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, u.rcu));
>  }
>  
>  static inline void release_probes(void *old)
> @@ -80,7 +83,7 @@ static inline void release_probes(void *old)
>  	if (old) {
>  		struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old,
>  			struct tp_probes, probes[0]);
> -		call_rcu(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> +		call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->u.rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -299,6 +302,23 @@ static void tracepoint_update_probes(void)
>  	module_update_tracepoints();
>  }
>  
> +static void *tracepoint_add_probe(const char *name, void *probe)
> +{
> +	struct tracepoint_entry *entry;
> +	void *old;
> +
> +	entry = get_tracepoint(name);
> +	if (!entry) {
> +		entry = add_tracepoint(name);
> +		if (IS_ERR(entry))
> +			return entry;
> +	}
> +	old = tracepoint_entry_add_probe(entry, probe);
> +	if (IS_ERR(old) && !entry->refcount)
> +		remove_tracepoint(entry);
> +	return old;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * tracepoint_probe_register -  Connect a probe to a tracepoint
>   * @name: tracepoint name
> @@ -309,36 +329,36 @@ static void tracepoint_update_probes(void)
>   */
>  int tracepoint_probe_register(const char *name, void *probe)
>  {
> -	struct tracepoint_entry *entry;
> -	int ret = 0;
>  	void *old;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	entry = get_tracepoint(name);
> -	if (!entry) {
> -		entry = add_tracepoint(name);
> -		if (IS_ERR(entry)) {
> -			ret = PTR_ERR(entry);
> -			goto end;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	old = tracepoint_entry_add_probe(entry, probe);
> -	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> -		if (!entry->refcount)
> -			remove_tracepoint(entry);
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(old);
> -		goto end;
> -	}
> +	old = tracepoint_add_probe(name, probe);
>  	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	if (IS_ERR(old))
> +		return PTR_ERR(old);
> +
>  	tracepoint_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
>  	release_probes(old);
>  	return 0;
> -end:
> -	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_probe_register);
>  
> +static void *tracepoint_remove_probe(const char *name, void *probe)
> +{
> +	struct tracepoint_entry *entry;
> +	void *old;
> +
> +	entry = get_tracepoint(name);
> +	if (!entry)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +	old = tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(entry, probe);
> +	if (IS_ERR(old))
> +		return old;
> +	if (!entry->refcount)
> +		remove_tracepoint(entry);
> +	return old;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * tracepoint_probe_unregister -  Disconnect a probe from a tracepoint
>   * @name: tracepoint name
> @@ -351,36 +371,110 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_probe_register);
>   */
>  int tracepoint_probe_unregister(const char *name, void *probe)
>  {
> -	struct tracepoint_entry *entry;
>  	void *old;
> -	int ret = -ENOENT;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	entry = get_tracepoint(name);
> -	if (!entry)
> -		goto end;
> -	old = tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(entry, probe);
>  	if (!old) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: Trying to unregister a probe"
>  				    "that doesn't exist\n");
>  		goto end;
>  	}
> -	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(old);
> -		goto end;
> -	}
> -	if (!entry->refcount)
> -		remove_tracepoint(entry);
> +	old = tracepoint_remove_probe(name, probe);
>  	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	if (IS_ERR(old))
> +		return PTR_ERR(old);
> +
>  	tracepoint_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
>  	release_probes(old);
>  	return 0;
> -end:
> -	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_probe_unregister);
>  
> +static LIST_HEAD(old_probes);
> +static int need_update;
> +
> +static void tracepoint_add_old_probes(void *old)
> +{
> +	need_update = 1;
> +	if (old) {
> +		struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old,
> +			struct tp_probes, probes[0]);
> +		list_add(&tp_probes->u.list, &old_probes);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * tracepoint_probe_register_noupdate -  register a probe but not connect
> + * @name: tracepoint name
> + * @probe: probe handler
> + *
> + * caller must call tracepoint_probe_update_all()
> + */
> +int tracepoint_probe_register_noupdate(const char *name, void *probe)
> +{
> +	void *old;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	old = tracepoint_add_probe(name, probe);
> +	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +		return PTR_ERR(old);
> +	}
> +	tracepoint_add_old_probes(old);
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_probe_register_noupdate);
> +
> +/**
> + * tracepoint_probe_unregister_noupdate -  remove a probe but not disconnect
> + * @name: tracepoint name
> + * @probe: probe function pointer
> + *
> + * caller must call tracepoint_probe_update_all()
> + */
> +int tracepoint_probe_unregister_noupdate(const char *name, void *probe)
> +{
> +	void *old;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	old = tracepoint_remove_probe(name, probe);
> +	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +		return PTR_ERR(old);
> +	}
> +	tracepoint_add_old_probes(old);
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_probe_unregister_noupdate);
> +
> +/**
> + * tracepoint_probe_update_all -  update tracepoints
> + */
> +void tracepoint_probe_update_all(void)
> +{
> +	LIST_HEAD(release_probes);
> +	struct tp_probes *pos, *next;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	if (!need_update) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	if (!list_empty(&old_probes))
> +		list_replace_init(&old_probes, &release_probes);
> +	need_update = 0;
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +
> +	tracepoint_update_probes();
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &release_probes, u.list) {
> +		list_del(&pos->u.list);
> +		call_rcu_sched(&pos->u.rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_probe_update_all);
> +
>  /**
>   * tracepoint_get_iter_range - Get a next tracepoint iterator given a range.
>   * @tracepoint: current tracepoints (in), next tracepoint (out)
> 
> commit bbec237d365b96ed6f5f372f1b090af374609059
> Author: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Oct 28 10:51:49 2008 +0800
> 
>     tracepoint: simplification for tracepoints using RCU
>     
>     Impact: simplify implementation
>     
>     Now, unused memory is handled by struct tp_probes.
>     
>     old code use these three field to handle unused memory.
>     struct tracepoint_entry {
>     	...
>     	struct rcu_head rcu;
>     	void *oldptr;
>     	unsigned char rcu_pending:1;
>     	...
>     };
>     
>     in this way, unused memory is handled by struct tracepoint_entry.
>     it bring reenter bug(it was fixed) and tracepoint.c is filled
>     full of ".*rcu.*" code statements. this patch removes all these.
>     
>     and:
>       rcu_barrier_sched() is removed.
>       Do not need regain tracepoints_mutex after tracepoint_update_probes()
>       several little cleanup.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> index af8c856..4159c2a 100644
> --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(tracepoints_mutex);
>   */
>  #define TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS 6
>  #define TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE (1 << TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS)
> +static struct hlist_head tracepoint_table[TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE];
>  
>  /*
>   * Note about RCU :
> @@ -54,40 +55,40 @@ struct tracepoint_entry {
>  	struct hlist_node hlist;
>  	void **funcs;
>  	int refcount;	/* Number of times armed. 0 if disarmed. */
> -	struct rcu_head rcu;
> -	void *oldptr;
> -	unsigned char rcu_pending:1;
>  	char name[0];
>  };
>  
> -static struct hlist_head tracepoint_table[TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE];
> +struct tp_probes {
> +	struct rcu_head rcu;
> +	void *probes[0];
> +};
>  
> -static void free_old_closure(struct rcu_head *head)
> +static inline void *allocate_probes(int count)
>  {
> -	struct tracepoint_entry *entry = container_of(head,
> -		struct tracepoint_entry, rcu);
> -	kfree(entry->oldptr);
> -	/* Make sure we free the data before setting the pending flag to 0 */
> -	smp_wmb();
> -	entry->rcu_pending = 0;
> +	struct tp_probes *p  = kmalloc(count * sizeof(void *)
> +			+ sizeof(struct tp_probes), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	return p == NULL ? NULL : p->probes;
>  }
>  
> -static void tracepoint_entry_free_old(struct tracepoint_entry *entry, void *old)
> +static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head)
>  {
> -	if (!old)
> -		return;
> -	entry->oldptr = old;
> -	entry->rcu_pending = 1;
> -	/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
> -	smp_wmb();
> -	call_rcu_sched(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
> +	kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void release_probes(void *old)
> +{
> +	if (old) {
> +		struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old,
> +			struct tp_probes, probes[0]);
> +		call_rcu(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void debug_print_probes(struct tracepoint_entry *entry)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	if (!tracepoint_debug)
> +	if (!tracepoint_debug || !entry->funcs)
>  		return;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; entry->funcs[i]; i++)
> @@ -111,12 +112,13 @@ tracepoint_entry_add_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry, void *probe)
>  				return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
>  	}
>  	/* + 2 : one for new probe, one for NULL func */
> -	new = kzalloc((nr_probes + 2) * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	new = allocate_probes(nr_probes + 2);
>  	if (new == NULL)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  	if (old)
>  		memcpy(new, old, nr_probes * sizeof(void *));
>  	new[nr_probes] = probe;
> +	new[nr_probes + 1] = NULL;
>  	entry->refcount = nr_probes + 1;
>  	entry->funcs = new;
>  	debug_print_probes(entry);
> @@ -151,13 +153,13 @@ tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry, void *probe)
>  		int j = 0;
>  		/* N -> M, (N > 1, M > 0) */
>  		/* + 1 for NULL */
> -		new = kzalloc((nr_probes - nr_del + 1)
> -			* sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		new = allocate_probes(nr_probes - nr_del + 1);
>  		if (new == NULL)
>  			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  		for (i = 0; old[i]; i++)
>  			if ((probe && old[i] != probe))
>  				new[j++] = old[i];
> +		new[nr_probes - nr_del] = NULL;
>  		entry->refcount = nr_probes - nr_del;
>  		entry->funcs = new;
>  	}
> @@ -215,7 +217,6 @@ static struct tracepoint_entry *add_tracepoint(const char *name)
>  	memcpy(&e->name[0], name, name_len);
>  	e->funcs = NULL;
>  	e->refcount = 0;
> -	e->rcu_pending = 0;
>  	hlist_add_head(&e->hlist, head);
>  	return e;
>  }
> @@ -224,32 +225,10 @@ static struct tracepoint_entry *add_tracepoint(const char *name)
>   * Remove the tracepoint from the tracepoint hash table. Must be called with
>   * mutex_lock held.
>   */
> -static int remove_tracepoint(const char *name)
> +static inline void remove_tracepoint(struct tracepoint_entry *e)
>  {
> -	struct hlist_head *head;
> -	struct hlist_node *node;
> -	struct tracepoint_entry *e;
> -	int found = 0;
> -	size_t len = strlen(name) + 1;
> -	u32 hash = jhash(name, len-1, 0);
> -
> -	head = &tracepoint_table[hash & (TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE - 1)];
> -	hlist_for_each_entry(e, node, head, hlist) {
> -		if (!strcmp(name, e->name)) {
> -			found = 1;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	if (!found)
> -		return -ENOENT;
> -	if (e->refcount)
> -		return -EBUSY;
>  	hlist_del(&e->hlist);
> -	/* Make sure the call_rcu_sched has been executed */
> -	if (e->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	kfree(e);
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -343,25 +322,17 @@ int tracepoint_probe_register(const char *name, void *probe)
>  			goto end;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	/*
> -	 * If we detect that a call_rcu_sched is pending for this tracepoint,
> -	 * make sure it's executed now.
> -	 */
> -	if (entry->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	old = tracepoint_entry_add_probe(entry, probe);
>  	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> +		if (!entry->refcount)
> +			remove_tracepoint(entry);
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(old);
>  		goto end;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	tracepoint_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
> -	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	entry = get_tracepoint(name);
> -	WARN_ON(!entry);
> -	if (entry->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier_sched();
> -	tracepoint_entry_free_old(entry, old);
> +	release_probes(old);
> +	return 0;
>  end:
>  	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -388,25 +359,22 @@ int tracepoint_probe_unregister(const char *name, void *probe)
>  	entry = get_tracepoint(name);
>  	if (!entry)
>  		goto end;
> -	if (entry->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	old = tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(entry, probe);
>  	if (!old) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: Trying to unregister a probe"
>  				    "that doesn't exist\n");
>  		goto end;
>  	}

it seems that this conflict is here. it seems that it is ok for just
removing this five line. my fix have tested the "old".

	Lai

> +	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(old);
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +	if (!entry->refcount)
> +		remove_tracepoint(entry);
>  	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	tracepoint_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
> -	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	entry = get_tracepoint(name);
> -	if (!entry)
> -		goto end;
> -	if (entry->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier_sched();
> -	tracepoint_entry_free_old(entry, old);
> -	remove_tracepoint(name);	/* Ignore busy error message */
> -	ret = 0;
> +	release_probes(old);
> +	return 0;
>  end:
>  	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	return ret;
> 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/