[PATCH] account_group_exec_runtime: fix the racy usage of ->signal

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Fri Nov 07 2008 - 10:52:39 EST


Compile tested.

Unlike other similar routines, account_group_exec_runtime() could be
called "implicitly" after exit_notify(). This means we can race with
the parent doing release_task(), we can't just check ->signal != NULL.

Take ->siglock to make sure ->signal can't go away.

This is the minimal fix, with this patch we don't need need get/put cpu,
and I think we should uninline this function.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- K-28/kernel/sched_stats.h~A_G_E_R_FIX 2008-11-07 17:32:02.000000000 +0100
+++ K-28/kernel/sched_stats.h 2008-11-07 17:44:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -351,10 +351,12 @@ static inline void account_group_exec_ru
unsigned long long ns)
{
struct signal_struct *sig;
+ unsigned long flags;

- sig = tsk->signal;
- if (unlikely(!sig))
+ if (unlikely(!lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags)))
return;
+
+ sig = tsk->signal;
if (sig->cputime.totals) {
struct task_cputime *times;

@@ -362,4 +364,6 @@ static inline void account_group_exec_ru
times->sum_exec_runtime += ns;
put_cpu_no_resched();
}
+
+ unlock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags);
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/