[patch] net: unix: fix inflight counting bug in garbage collector

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Sun Nov 09 2008 - 09:24:32 EST


Hi David,

This patch fixes the BUG_ON triggered by Andrea's tests. It turned
out to be completely independent of the stack overflow issue, but
happens to be triggered by the same test program.

Should qualify for -stable too.

Thanks,
Miklos

----
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>

Previously I assumed that the receive queues of candidates don't
change during the GC. This is only half true, nothing can be received
from the queues (see comment in unix_gc()), but buffers could be added
through the other half of the socket pair, which may still have file
descriptors referring to it.

This can result in inc_inflight_move_tail() erronously increasing the
"inflight" counter for a unix socket for which dec_inflight() wasn't
previously called. This in turn can trigger the "BUG_ON(total_refs <
inflight_refs)" in a later garbage collection run.

Fix this by only manipulating the "inflight" counter for sockets which
are candidates themselves. Duplicating the file references in
unix_attach_fds() is also needed to prevent a socket becoming a
candidate for GC while the skb that contains it is not yet queued.

Reported-by: Andrea Bittau <a.bittau@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
---
include/net/af_unix.h | 1 +
net/unix/af_unix.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
net/unix/garbage.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Index: linux.git/include/net/af_unix.h
===================================================================
--- linux.git.orig/include/net/af_unix.h 2008-11-09 14:39:04.000000000 +0100
+++ linux.git/include/net/af_unix.h 2008-11-09 14:39:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct unix_sock {
atomic_long_t inflight;
spinlock_t lock;
unsigned int gc_candidate : 1;
+ unsigned int gc_maybe_cycle : 1;
wait_queue_head_t peer_wait;
};
#define unix_sk(__sk) ((struct unix_sock *)__sk)
Index: linux.git/net/unix/garbage.c
===================================================================
--- linux.git.orig/net/unix/garbage.c 2008-11-09 14:39:04.000000000 +0100
+++ linux.git/net/unix/garbage.c 2008-11-09 14:39:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -186,8 +186,17 @@ static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x
*/
struct sock *sk = unix_get_socket(*fp++);
if (sk) {
- hit = true;
- func(unix_sk(sk));
+ struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
+
+ /*
+ * Ignore non-candidates, they could
+ * have been added to the queues after
+ * starting the garbage collection
+ */
+ if (u->gc_candidate) {
+ hit = true;
+ func(u);
+ }
}
}
if (hit && hitlist != NULL) {
@@ -249,11 +258,11 @@ static void inc_inflight_move_tail(struc
{
atomic_long_inc(&u->inflight);
/*
- * If this is still a candidate, move it to the end of the
- * list, so that it's checked even if it was already passed
- * over
+ * If this still might be part of a cycle, move it to the end
+ * of the list, so that it's checked even if it was already
+ * passed over
*/
- if (u->gc_candidate)
+ if (u->gc_maybe_cycle)
list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_candidates);
}

@@ -267,6 +276,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
struct unix_sock *next;
struct sk_buff_head hitlist;
struct list_head cursor;
+ LIST_HEAD(not_cycle_list);

spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);

@@ -282,10 +292,14 @@ void unix_gc(void)
*
* Holding unix_gc_lock will protect these candidates from
* being detached, and hence from gaining an external
- * reference. This also means, that since there are no
- * possible receivers, the receive queues of these sockets are
- * static during the GC, even though the dequeue is done
- * before the detach without atomicity guarantees.
+ * reference. Since there are no possible receivers, all
+ * buffers currently on the candidates' queues stay there
+ * during the garbage collection.
+ *
+ * We also know that no new candidate can be added onto the
+ * receive queues. Other, non candidate sockets _can_ be
+ * added to queue, so we must make sure only to touch
+ * candidates.
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(u, next, &gc_inflight_list, link) {
long total_refs;
@@ -299,6 +313,7 @@ void unix_gc(void)
if (total_refs == inflight_refs) {
list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_candidates);
u->gc_candidate = 1;
+ u->gc_maybe_cycle = 1;
}
}

@@ -325,14 +340,24 @@ void unix_gc(void)
list_move(&cursor, &u->link);

if (atomic_long_read(&u->inflight) > 0) {
- list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_inflight_list);
- u->gc_candidate = 0;
+ list_move_tail(&u->link, &not_cycle_list);
+ u->gc_maybe_cycle = 0;
scan_children(&u->sk, inc_inflight_move_tail, NULL);
}
}
list_del(&cursor);

/*
+ * not_cycle_list contains those sockets which do not make up a
+ * cycle. Restore these to the inflight list.
+ */
+ while (!list_empty(&not_cycle_list)) {
+ u = list_entry(not_cycle_list.next, struct unix_sock, link);
+ u->gc_candidate = 0;
+ list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_inflight_list);
+ }
+
+ /*
* Now gc_candidates contains only garbage. Restore original
* inflight counters for these as well, and remove the skbuffs
* which are creating the cycle(s).
Index: linux.git/net/unix/af_unix.c
===================================================================
--- linux.git.orig/net/unix/af_unix.c 2008-11-09 14:39:04.000000000 +0100
+++ linux.git/net/unix/af_unix.c 2008-11-09 14:39:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -1302,14 +1302,23 @@ static void unix_destruct_fds(struct sk_
sock_wfree(skb);
}

-static void unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static int unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Need to duplicate file references for the sake of garbage
+ * collection. Otherwise a socket in the fps might become a
+ * candidate for GC while the skb is not yet queued.
+ */
+ UNIXCB(skb).fp = scm_fp_dup(scm->fp);
+ if (!UNIXCB(skb).fp)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
for (i=scm->fp->count-1; i>=0; i--)
unix_inflight(scm->fp->fp[i]);
- UNIXCB(skb).fp = scm->fp;
skb->destructor = unix_destruct_fds;
- scm->fp = NULL;
+ return 0;
}

/*
@@ -1368,8 +1377,11 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct kio
goto out;

memcpy(UNIXCREDS(skb), &siocb->scm->creds, sizeof(struct ucred));
- if (siocb->scm->fp)
- unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
+ if (siocb->scm->fp) {
+ err = unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_free;
+ }
unix_get_secdata(siocb->scm, skb);

skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
@@ -1538,8 +1550,13 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct ki
size = min_t(int, size, skb_tailroom(skb));

memcpy(UNIXCREDS(skb), &siocb->scm->creds, sizeof(struct ucred));
- if (siocb->scm->fp)
- unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
+ if (siocb->scm->fp) {
+ err = unix_attach_fds(siocb->scm, skb);
+ if (err) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+ }

if ((err = memcpy_fromiovec(skb_put(skb,size), msg->msg_iov, size)) != 0) {
kfree_skb(skb);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/