Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac x38: new MC driver module

[Paul Mundt]

On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 11:26:46AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc linux-arch)
> 
> > It seems that architectures that provide readq/writeq are
> > mips, parisc and x86 (and x86_64).
> > 
There are more than that, grep arch/*/include also.

In addition to mips, parisc, and x86, there is ia64, alpha, sh, and
sparc.

> #ifdef readq
> 
> Is a suitable way of determining whether the architecture implements
> readq and writeq.  It isn't pretty, but it will suffice.
> 
> A problem with it is that drivers will then do
> 
> #ifndef readq
> <provide a local implementation here>
> #endif
> 
> which rather sucks - we don't want lots of little private readq/writeq
> implementations all over the tree.
> 
> Perhaps it would be better to have a CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_READQ and to then
> disable these drivers on the architectures which don't provide
> readq/writeq support.
> 
However this is handled, we don't want a rehash of the read/writes{b,w,l} fiasco.

Allowing drivers to do their own local implementations of these things
has always been a complete disaster. A Kconfig option will at least take
care of having these craptastic ifdef lists for architectures in every
driver that rolls its own implementation.

Even a sub-optimal asm-generic version would be preferable, if the
semantics are well enough defined and consistently adhered to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/