Re: [PATCH] Fix section type conflict in arch/ia64/xen/xen_pv_ops.c

From: Isaku Yamahata
Date: Tue Nov 11 2008 - 03:56:29 EST


On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 09:18:50AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:15:52 +0900,
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:51:11AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:48:48 +0100,
> > > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:57:21AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > > > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > >__initdata and const cannot be always a happy pair, as gcc-4.3.3 gives
> > > > > >the compile errors like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > arch/ia64/xen/xen_pv_ops.c:156: error: xen_init_ops causes a section
> > > > > > type conflict
> > > > > > arch/ia64/xen/xen_pv_ops.c:340: error: xen_iosapic_ops causes a section
> > > > > > type conflict
> > > > > >
> > > > > >This patch simply removes const from data with __initdata.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, I've seen these sort of messages before, but I don't see why
> > > > > there's an inherent problem with having const __initdata.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sam?
> > > >
> > > > The root problem here is that in some cases gcc will stuff this into
> > > > a section marked CONST and in other cases not.
> > > > So when we manually specify the section we better not mix const and
> > > > non-const stuff in the same section.
> > > > The problem is that it is very gcc dependent. I have with powerpc
> > > > seen that the same code was not put in CONST with a 32 bit build,
> > > > but with the 64 bit build it was.
> > > > The only cure was to remove the const and use initdata.
> > > > You can try to play with initconst - and it may work.
> > > > But you need to have pretty good build coverage to be sure.
> > >
> > > OK, then my original patch should do right :)
> > > Do you guys see any problems with it?
> > >
> > > Right now 2.6.28-rc kernel doesn't build, thus this is basically a
> > > regression.
> >
> > I'm fine with the patch.
> >
> > The above sounds x86 xen potentially has the same issue, though.
> >
> > linux-2.6/arch/x86/xen $ grep __initdata *
> > enlighten.c:static const struct pv_info xen_info __initdata = {
> > enlighten.c:static const struct pv_init_ops xen_init_ops __initdata = {
> > enlighten.c:static const struct pv_time_ops xen_time_ops __initdata = {
> > enlighten.c:static const struct pv_cpu_ops xen_cpu_ops __initdata = {
> > enlighten.c:static const struct pv_apic_ops xen_apic_ops __initdata = {
> > enlighten.c:static const struct pv_mmu_ops xen_mmu_ops __initdata = {
> > enlighten.c:static const struct machine_ops __initdata xen_machine_ops = {
> > irq.c:static const struct pv_irq_ops xen_irq_ops __initdata = {
> > smp.c:static const struct smp_ops xen_smp_ops __initdata = {
>
> Oh, care to create a patch?

Here is.

__initdata and const cannot be always a happy pair and
x86 xen has the potential issue.
This patch simply removes const from data with __initdata
under arch/x86/xen/.

Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 0013a72..19f758c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1173,14 +1173,14 @@ static void xen_set_fixmap(unsigned idx, unsigned long phys, pgprot_t prot)
#endif
}

-static const struct pv_info xen_info __initdata = {
+static struct pv_info xen_info __initdata = {
.paravirt_enabled = 1,
.shared_kernel_pmd = 0,

.name = "Xen",
};

-static const struct pv_init_ops xen_init_ops __initdata = {
+static struct pv_init_ops xen_init_ops __initdata = {
.patch = xen_patch,

.banner = xen_banner,
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static const struct pv_init_ops xen_init_ops __initdata = {
.post_allocator_init = xen_post_allocator_init,
};

-static const struct pv_time_ops xen_time_ops __initdata = {
+static struct pv_time_ops xen_time_ops __initdata = {
.time_init = xen_time_init,

.set_wallclock = xen_set_wallclock,
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ static const struct pv_time_ops xen_time_ops __initdata = {
.sched_clock = xen_sched_clock,
};

-static const struct pv_cpu_ops xen_cpu_ops __initdata = {
+static struct pv_cpu_ops xen_cpu_ops __initdata = {
.cpuid = xen_cpuid,

.set_debugreg = xen_set_debugreg,
@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ static const struct pv_cpu_ops xen_cpu_ops __initdata = {
},
};

-static const struct pv_apic_ops xen_apic_ops __initdata = {
+static struct pv_apic_ops xen_apic_ops __initdata = {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
.setup_boot_clock = paravirt_nop,
.setup_secondary_clock = paravirt_nop,
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static const struct pv_apic_ops xen_apic_ops __initdata = {
#endif
};

-static const struct pv_mmu_ops xen_mmu_ops __initdata = {
+static struct pv_mmu_ops xen_mmu_ops __initdata = {
.pagetable_setup_start = xen_pagetable_setup_start,
.pagetable_setup_done = xen_pagetable_setup_done,

@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ static void xen_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_crash);
}

-static const struct machine_ops __initdata xen_machine_ops = {
+static struct machine_ops __initdata xen_machine_ops = {
.restart = xen_restart,
.halt = xen_machine_halt,
.power_off = xen_machine_halt,
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/irq.c b/arch/x86/xen/irq.c
index 28b85ab..ffadf3a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/irq.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void xen_halt(void)
xen_safe_halt();
}

-static const struct pv_irq_ops xen_irq_ops __initdata = {
+static struct pv_irq_ops xen_irq_ops __initdata = {
.init_IRQ = __xen_init_IRQ,
.save_fl = xen_save_fl,
.restore_fl = xen_restore_fl,
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
index d77da61..f0a1ea3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static irqreturn_t xen_call_function_single_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}

-static const struct smp_ops xen_smp_ops __initdata = {
+static struct smp_ops xen_smp_ops __initdata = {
.smp_prepare_boot_cpu = xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu,
.smp_prepare_cpus = xen_smp_prepare_cpus,
.smp_cpus_done = xen_smp_cpus_done,


--
yamahata
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/