Re: [PATCH] x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again
> 
> My previous patch to make CONFIG_NUMA on x86_32 depend on BROKEN
> turned out to be unnecessary, after all, since the source of the
> hibernation vs CONFIG_NUMA problem turned out to be the fact that
> we didn't take the NUMA KVA remapping into account in the
> hibernation code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to tip/x86/numa, thanks Rafael!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/