Re: Fix broken ownership of /proc/sys/ files

[Linus Torvalds]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> > 
> > We already initialize a _lot_ of fields, including fields that most 
> > filesystem would likely end up re-initializing when reading an inode (like 
> > i_size and i_nlink). Maybe it would be more sensible to initialize 
> > i_gid/uid there too, when we are guaranteed to have that cacheline dirty 
> > anyway (because we're initializing everything around those fields).
> 
> *nod*
> 
> It certainly makes sense to do it in a uniform way - there's enough
> users of new_inode() that want exactly that.  I'll do that as soon
> as I get from under a huge pile of pending mail ;-/

Ok. I think zeroing i_mode might be a good idea too. Just to make sure..

> ObPendingStuff: would you mind a series of section annotations?  That's
> a bunch of trivial one-liners and it kills the section noise - the remaining
> ones are few and tricky.  It had sat around in my tree for several weeks
> and I can certainly carry it until the next cycle, but OTOH this stuff
> *is* trivial and the noise is annoying as hell.

Yeah, it would be good to get rid of at least the bulk of the section 
warnings. A lot of them have historically been 100% real problems.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/