Re: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched:cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance]

[Max Krasnyansky]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> What you described is almost exactly what I did in my original cpu 
>> isolation patch, which did get NAKed :). Basically I used global 
>> cpu_isolated_map and exposed 'isolated' bit, etc.
> 
> Please extend cpusets according to the plan outlined by PeterZ a few 
> months ago - that's the right place to do partitioning.

Already did. It's all in mainline. The part you quoted was just pointing out
that the original approach was not correct.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/