Re: [PATCH 0/9] powerpc: port of dynamic ftrace

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Nov 20 2008 - 10:05:04 EST



* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> branch: ppc/ftrace-disable
>
>
> Matt Fleming (1):
> ftrace: align __mcount_loc sections
>
> Steven Rostedt (8):
> ftrace: disable dynamic ftrace from PowerPC
> powerpc: ftrace, do not latency trace idle
> powerpc: ftrace, convert to new dynamic ftrace arch API
> powerpc/ppc64: ftrace, mcount record powerpc port
> powerpc: ftrace, use probe_kernel API to modify code
> powerpc/ppc64: ftrace, handle module trampolines for dyn ftrace
> powerpc/ppc32: ftrace, enabled dynamic ftrace
> powerpc/ppc32: ftrace, dynamic ftrace to handle modules
>
> ----
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 14 +-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/module.h | 16 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c | 473 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 5 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_32.c | 10 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 13 +
> kernel/trace/Kconfig | 1 +
> scripts/recordmcount.pl | 20 ++-
> 9 files changed, 511 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> There is a dependency on Matt's commit for one of the PPC commits to
> apply. I could hack that commit to work without Matt's patch, but
> then that just postpones conflicts later on.
>
> Matt's change is this:
>
> scripts/recordmcount.pl | 20 ++-

looks much better and the (minimal) generic impact is OK i think - as
long as Paul Acks the powerpc changes we could freeze that branch (so
that Paul can pull it in a few weeks) and base your ftrace-powerpc
work on that.

( The branch should still be named something constructive like
powerpc-ftrace-v29 or so - not ppc/ftrace-disable - but that's a
detail. )

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/