Re: [PATCH] x86: clean up after: move entry_64.S register savingout of the macros

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> 20.11.08 16:39 >>>
>movq_cfi for the frame construction direction and movq_cfi_restore for 
>the frame deconstruction phase sounds like a good naming compromise, hm?

How about movq_spill and movq_fill (losely following some ia64 terminology)?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/