Re: [PATCH 30 of 38] xen: implement io_apic_ops

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Thu Nov 20 2008 - 14:39:26 EST


Yinghai Lu wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:

it certainly looks thin enough to me although i'm really not sure we want to virtualize at the IO-APIC level. Peter, what's your opinion/preference?


relative fixed mapping, always make it simple and tracked easily.
like irq nr == gsi nr...

That was a bit terse for me to understand your point. The code already has irq==gsi. Are you proposing that it stay that way, or something else?

J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/