Re: [PATCH] xen: pin correct PGD on suspend

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Fri Nov 21 2008 - 11:32:48 EST


Ian Campbell wrote:
commit eefb47f6a1e855653d275cb90592a3587ea93a09 ("xen: use
spin_lock_nest_lock when pinning a pagetable") changed xen_pgd_walk to
walk over mm->pgd rather than taking pgd as an argument.

This breaks xen_mm_(un)pin_all() because it makes init_mm.pgd readonly
instead of the pgd we are interested in and therefore the pin subsequently
fails.

Oh, yeah, that was a bit dense. This is needed for .28.

Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
J

(XEN) mm.c:2280:d15 Bad type (saw 00000000e8000001 != exp 0000000060000000) for mfn bc464 (pfn 21ca7)
(XEN) mm.c:2665:d15 Error while pinning mfn bc464

[ 14.586913] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0
[ 14.586926] Pid: 14, comm: kstop/0 Not tainted 2.6.28-rc5-x86_32p-xenU-00172-gee2f6cc #200
[ 14.586940] Call Trace:
[ 14.586955] [<c030c17a>] ? printk+0x18/0x1e
[ 14.586972] [<c0103df3>] xen_mc_flush+0x163/0x1d0
[ 14.586986] [<c0104bc1>] __xen_pgd_pin+0xa1/0x110
[ 14.587000] [<c015a330>] ? stop_cpu+0x0/0xf0
[ 14.587015] [<c0104d7b>] xen_mm_pin_all+0x4b/0x70
[ 14.587029] [<c022bcb9>] xen_suspend+0x39/0xe0
[ 14.587042] [<c015a330>] ? stop_cpu+0x0/0xf0
[ 14.587054] [<c015a3cd>] stop_cpu+0x9d/0xf0
[ 14.587067] [<c01417cd>] run_workqueue+0x8d/0x150
[ 14.587080] [<c030e4b3>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x23/0x40
[ 14.587094] [<c014558a>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x3a/0x70
[ 14.587107] [<c0141918>] worker_thread+0x88/0xf0
[ 14.587120] [<c01453c0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[ 14.587133] [<c0141890>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0xf0
[ 14.587146] [<c014509c>] kthread+0x3c/0x70
[ 14.587157] [<c0145060>] ? kthread+0x0/0x70
[ 14.587170] [<c0109d1b>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[ 14.587181] call 1/3: op=14 arg=[c0415000] result=0
[ 14.587192] call 2/3: op=14 arg=[e1ca2000] result=0
[ 14.587204] call 3/3: op=26 arg=[c1808860] result=-22

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
index 6889360..636ef4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
@@ -661,12 +661,11 @@ void xen_set_pgd(pgd_t *ptr, pgd_t val)
* For 64-bit, we must skip the Xen hole in the middle of the address
* space, just after the big x86-64 virtual hole.
*/
-static int xen_pgd_walk(struct mm_struct *mm,
- int (*func)(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page *,
- enum pt_level),
- unsigned long limit)
+static int __xen_pgd_walk(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
+ int (*func)(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page *,
+ enum pt_level),
+ unsigned long limit)
{
- pgd_t *pgd = mm->pgd;
int flush = 0;
unsigned hole_low, hole_high;
unsigned pgdidx_limit, pudidx_limit, pmdidx_limit;
@@ -753,6 +752,14 @@ out:
return flush;
}
+static int xen_pgd_walk(struct mm_struct *mm,
+ int (*func)(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page *,
+ enum pt_level),
+ unsigned long limit)
+{
+ return __xen_pgd_walk(mm, mm->pgd, func, limit);
+}
+
/* If we're using split pte locks, then take the page's lock and
return a pointer to it. Otherwise return NULL. */
static spinlock_t *xen_pte_lock(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -854,7 +861,7 @@ static void __xen_pgd_pin(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
xen_mc_batch();
- if (xen_pgd_walk(mm, xen_pin_page, USER_LIMIT)) {
+ if (__xen_pgd_walk(mm, pgd, xen_pin_page, USER_LIMIT)) {
/* re-enable interrupts for flushing */
xen_mc_issue(0);
@@ -998,7 +1005,7 @@ static void __xen_pgd_unpin(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
PT_PMD);
#endif
- xen_pgd_walk(mm, xen_unpin_page, USER_LIMIT);
+ __xen_pgd_walk(mm, pgd, xen_unpin_page, USER_LIMIT);
xen_mc_issue(0);
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/