Re: [PATCH 2.6.28-rc5 01/11] kmemleak: Add the base support

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Mon Nov 24 2008 - 03:19:55 EST


On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, but I don't really see any fundamental reason why we couldn't do
> this. I mean, from my point of view, it would be better to add
> specialized hooks (i.e. separate allocation paths for the kmemleak hooks
> that avoid any issues) inside the SLAB allocators rather than invent a
> separate allocator. As an example,

Oops, I don't know where that "as an example" part came from so just
ignore it. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/