Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related

[Fabio Comolli]

Hi

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 of November 2008, Stefan Richter wrote:
>>
>> The 2.6.27.5 changelog shows a bunch of ACPI changes.  They may not be
>> responsible, but in my uninformed opinion these are the changes to look
>> at more closely.  Since plain bisection did not work well for you, maybe
>> you should ask the maintainers involved in the ACPI patches for a
>> priority list of patches to unapply for long-term tests.
>
> Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits
> applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest.

Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits
in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7.

I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if
the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly,

By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems.

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>

Regards,
Fabio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/