Re: [PATCH 00/09] memcg: split-lru feature for memcg

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:54:08 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Recently, SplitLRU patch series dramatically improvement VM reclaim
> logic.
> 
> it have following improvement.
>  (1) splite lru per page type
>  (2) introduce inactive/active anon balancing logic
>  (3) introduce anon/file balancing logic
> 
> Unfortunately, the improvement of memcgroup reclaim is incomplete.
> Currently, it only has (1), but doesn't have (2) and (3).
> 
> 
> This patch introduce (2) and (3) improvements to memcgroup.
> this implementation is straightforward porting from global reclaim.
> 
> Therefere
>   - code is simple.
>   - memcg reclaim become efficiency as global reclaim.
>   - the logic is the same as global lru.
>     then, memcg reclaim debugging become easily.
> 
> 
> this patch series has three part
> 
> [part 1: inactive-anon vs active-anon balancing improvement]
>   [01/09] inactive_anon_is_low() move to vmscan.c
>   [02/09] memcg: make inactive_anon_is_low()
> 
> [part 2: anon vs file balancing improvement]
>   [03/09] introduce zone_reclaim struct
>   [04/09] memcg: make zone_reclaim_stat
>   [05/09] make zone_nr_pages() helper function
>   [06/09] make get_scan_ratio() to memcg awareness
>   [07/09] memcg: remove mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim()
> 
> [part 3: add split-lru related statics field to /cgroup/memory.stat]
>   [08/09] memcg: show inactive_ratio
>   [09/09] memcg: show reclaim stat
> 
> patch against: mmotm 29 Nov 2008
> 

Hi, kosaki. thank you for your work.

My request is
 . split global-lru part and memcg part explicitly.
 
There are Nishimura's patch and my patch under development.
I may have to prepare weekly-update queue again.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/