Re: [RFC v1][PATCH]page_fault retry with NOPAGE_RETRY

[Mike Waychison]

Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2008-11-29 01:02, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:03:40AM -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > > > Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 01:28:41AM -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > > > > > Török however identified mmap taking on the order of several
> > > > > > milliseconds due to this exact problem:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/12/185
> > > > > Turns out to be a different problem.
> > > > What do you mean?
> > > His is just contending on the write side. The retry patch doesn't help.
> > I disagree.  How do you get 'write contention' from the following
> > paragraph:
> >
> > "Just to confirm that the problem is with pagefaults and mmap, I dropped
> > the mmap_sem in filemap_fault, and then
> > I got same performance in my testprogram for mmap and read. Of course
> > this is totally unsafe, because the mapping could change at any time."
> >
> > It reads to me that the writers were held off by the readers sleeping
> > in IO.
>
> It is true that I have a write/write contention too, but do_page_fault
> shows up too on lock_stat.
>
> This is my guess at what happens:
> * filemap_fault used to sleep with mmap_sem held while waiting for the
> page lock.
> * the google patch avoids that, which is fine: if page lock can't be
> taken, it drops mmap_sem, waits, then retries the fault once
> * however after we acquired the page lock, mapping->a_ops->readpage is
> invoked, mmap_sem is NOT dropped here:
>
>     error = mapping->a_ops->readpage(file, page);
>     if (!error) {
>         wait_on_page_locked(page);
>
> If my understanding is correct ->readpage does the actual disk I/O, and
> it keeps the page locked, when the lock is released we know it has finished.
> So wait_on_page_locked(page)  holds mmap_sem locked for read during the
> disk I/O, preventing sys_mmap/sys_munmap from making progress.
>
> I don't know how to prove/disprove my guess above, suggestions welcome.
>
> Could the patch be changed to also release the mmap_sem after readpage,
> and before wait_on_page_locked?

Ya, my suspicion is that there is still some other code path where we 
are waiting on the locked page with mmap_sem still held.  Ying and I 
will take a closer look this week.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/